July 2008 Entries

Register now for the workshop. Space is limited. Companies who wish to participate should register no later than August 15. Read the rest of the entry to download the registration form.

 Click this link to download the form: Workshop Registration.pdf (154.59 KB)

Retired bus executive Ken Stanley on the benefits of rail. Click here to listen:

 

Ken Stanley KHPR.mp3 (1.81 MB)
As former state transportation directors and a former deputy director for environmental health, we are intimately familiar with O'ahu's transportation needs and the importance of protecting our environment. That's why we are fully confident in our unequivocal support for Honolulu's rail mass-transit project.

Since the federal mass-transit program was initiated in 1964, cities and metropolitan areas in the U.S. have studied urban mass-transit systems to fix the overloaded highway systems used by cars, trucks and buses. Honolulu was no exception.

Under several mayors and governors, City Councils and state Legislatures, several independent studies have been conducted, each time concluding that some form of mass transit was needed.

Controversy and indecision prevented a decision every time. Today, everyone agrees that the system is broken, and needs to be fixed. Our highways are bumper-to-bumper with cars, trucks, and buses every day, for hours at a time.

Honolulu has a difficult geographic problem that exacerbates our transportation problem. The downtown business and government center is located in a narrow constricted "throat" between Punchbowl and the waterfront. Unlike other cities, we cannot build a circumferential or bypass highway to alleviate downtown traffic. It is obvious that putting more highway lanes through this constricted corridor is costly and foolish. The object is to move more people, not more cars and buses.

A light-rail system can carry several times the number of passengers per track (or lane) per hour compared to a bus system, and is clearly a more efficient and effective use of precious space through the expensive downtown corridor.

Many other cities have reached the same conclusion, that the best transportation solution for them is a combination of cars and buses on highways plus a high-capacity rail transit system, rather than an expanded highway system to accommodate more buses and cars. More buses are not the answer, because they will merely become trapped in the same gridlock as everyone else.

If they were to use new dedicated lanes like the light rail trains, they will be less efficient, more costly to operate, and produce more air pollution.

Rail is tested and trusted in cities across the United States and in countries throughout the world. Rail is a modern, reliable, convenient and environmentally friendly alternative to clogged freeways and expensive fossil fuels that pollute our air.

To remove light-rail transit from further consideration as advocated by the opponents in the petition being circulated is to ignore not only the exhaustive studies done by expert consultants hired by the city, but the accumulated evidence from other American cities of medium to large size that have opted for rail transit.

Building rail transit systems has long been viewed by health experts as an excellent way to limit harmful vehicle emissions and improve air quality. With mounting concerns about the link between greenhouse gases and global warming, rail makes more sense now than ever.

The draft environmental impact statement for this project is now nearly complete and will be distributed for public comment in the fall. Every aspect of this project is subject to the strict oversight of the Federal Transit Administration, which has offered major support for similar projects that were sidetracked in the past.

O'ahu needs a balanced transportation system, and the rail system will provide the backbone for a comprehensive multi-modal network that also includes buses, ferries, bicycle lanes, car pools, taxis and, of course, private vehicles. We've needed rail transit for decades, and rail technology has continued to improve. A steel-wheel-on-steel-rail system will be the most reliable, economical and efficient alternative.

The opponents of rail transit have a right to express their views and attempt to derail this project. But let's be very clear: There is no need for more studies and more delays. We commend Mayor Mufi Hannemann for his strong leadership on this issue. Rail transit has already been studied to death on O'ahu, and it is clearly our best transportation option. It's time to move forward. Far too much time has been wasted already.


Fujio Matsuda, Ed Hirata, Kazu Hayashida and Rod Haraga are former state transportation directors. James Kumagai was a deputy state health director.

By Roger Morton, president and general manager of O'ahu Transit Services Inc.

More buses are not the best solution to our island's growing traffic congestion. A modern steel fixed-guideway rail system is.

Don't get me wrong. We have a great bus system in Honolulu. Currently, TheBus accommodates about 230,000 daily boarding trips, and ridership is growing as gas prices increase. According to Federal Transit Administration data, the per-capita transit-riding rate on O'ahu is about 100 trips per person per year, making Honolulu the fourth-highest ranked transit city in America. This makes Hono-lulu a transit town.

As president of O'ahu Transit Services (TheBus and TheHandi-Van) and a career transit professional, I am proud of TheBus and the great job our dedicated employees are doing. But I am also a strong supporter of a high-capacity rail system that will form the backbone of a well-integrated bus/rail transit system.

Despite what some are saying, adding substantially more buses to Downtown streets is not a good idea. During peak times, we operate a bus every 30 seconds at the King-Liliha junction and about every 45 seconds along Kuhio Avenue. In Central Hono-lulu we have few through roads, and our Downtown and Waikiki streets are already at capacity and cannot accommodate increased numbers of buses.

Increasing our fleet by 50 percent, as some have suggested, would result in a nonstop ribbon of buses along our major streets and further slow traffic.

Buses are also not without impact. An accelerating bus is louder than a modern rail system, emits greenhouse gases, and uses increasingly costly and scarce petroleum products.

Operating a larger bus fleet would also be more costly than operating an integrated bus/rail system. Across the country, the cost per passenger mile for rail is about half the cost of buses. The difference is even greater in cities with a high utilization of buses.

The fact is that our Honolulu bus system has a higher utilization per vehicle than any other major bus fleet in cities across the U.S. And as traffic congestion increases, our trip times get longer and our costs go up. Today, our service runs 10 percent slower than it did 20 years ago.

Increased traffic also makes it hard for TheBus to offer reliable service. We work hard to keep our buses on time despite unpredictable traffic. Many times we must turn buses back short or divert bus trips just to cope with existing traffic congestion. Turning a bus back short or adjusting a trip inconveniences some passengers. But we must if we want our buses to run on-time for the majority.

Even with all this effort, we have a severe problem with on-time reliability. We will lose customers unless we can offer reliable service. A backbone rail system will result in greater reliability for riders and will lead to greater ridership.

As gas prices increase, our bus system is approaching realistic capacity at peak hours when most customers want to ride. Today, we average about 25 to 35 times per day when drivers report that they are leaving passengers behind because the bus is completely full. Often times, it's an articulated bus with a higher seating capacity. Our system needs the higher capacity that a rail system can offer.

Buses will always play an important role in any transit system. But rubber-tired vehicles, whether guided or not, must use the same Downtown streets as buses.

Such a system is not a high-capacity solution for our future. A modern grade-separated steel-wheeled system promises the best performance and the lowest risk of the available technologies. The best way for us to improve our bus system is to develop an integrated bus-rail system that works for commuters, students, our elderly, our disabled citizens and our visitors. It's the best and the most cost-effective alternative.

That's why I support a high-capacity rail system.

Originally published in The Honolulu Advertiser.